Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Europa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fly Europa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a proposed business model, which never materialized. Therefore, it fails the general notability guideline. The page content consists entirely of product announcements, thus it should be deleted per WP:CRYSTAL. --FoxyOrange (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but for a slightly different reason. We can have articles about proposed / planned / future things if they get substantial coverage from independent sources; even a list of future products is fine if it's framed appropriately and if that's what independent sources are interested in. However, in this case, Fly Europa lacks coverage by independent sources - apart from a couple of forums - so it fails the GNG. bobrayner (talk) 10:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Chutznik (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.