Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ruby Circle
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural WP:SNOW close. The nomination is essentially asking in part for information about the novel to be added to the page, and if the nominator wants the redirect to be deleted, then Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion would be the place for this. North America1000 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Ruby Circle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page is meant to be about the novel itself, yet only contains a redirect to the author, which is misleading. Nikkisha16 (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - this was an article before - see here. I'm confused as to what you are requesting. Do you want to write an article on this book or do you want the entire article deleted? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: That rev was a pretty obvious copyvio. I've put a CV-Revdel on the page. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Unclear why this AFD was made, it's fine as a redirect as-is. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Padgriffin, absent any clarification on why the redirect has been nominated for deletion. _MB190417_ (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy close. This is the wrong venue. WP:RfD is thataway. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:CSK. The deletion rationale is completely erroneous (CSK#3) and the discussion is at the wrong deletion forum. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:CSK. I agree with others above that this is the wrong venue. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 02:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Close. Valid redirect and erroneous rationale in incorrect venue. VickKiang (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.